VR2-0773

回到這篇 SA Coverage

① SA Source

Context Before

image

Source: SemiAnalysis AI TCO Model ↗

Evidence

Inference throughput too can diverge materially from marketed peak FLOPS, meaning spec-sheet compute does not directly translate into real-world token generation performance. While the B300 is rated at 4,500 Dense FP8 TFLOPs versus 5,000 Dense FP8 TFLOPs for MI355, implying a 10% theoretical compute disadvantage and with same marketed memory bandwidth of 8TB/s measured inference token throughput from our InferenceX ↗ benchmarks shows B300 delivering roughly 6.3x the performance at 100 interactivity for Deepseek R1, using 8k input tokens and 1k output tokens.

Context After

Given that total cost of ownership is only 1.75x higher, this results in a superior performance-per-TCO profile for B300 despite the more modest marketed figures. Such a wildly different result despite very similar specs underscores that real world performance is not dictated by peak FLOPS or memory bandwidth alone. Software and network capabilities are also major factors that contribute to training and token throughput in real workloads.

Rubin and MI4XX will ship with new microarchitectures, real world performance is especially difficult to predict without and benchmarking like we do with InferenceX.

② Atomic Claim

MI355 額定為 5,000 dense FP8 TFLOPs。

  • Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
  • Mapping Status: COMPLETE

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "attribute": "COMPUTE_PERFORMANCE",
  "context_nodes": [
    {
      "id": "04_knowledge_base/FP8",
      "label": "FP8"
    },
    {
      "id": "04_knowledge_base/TFLOPS",
      "label": "TFLOPs"
    }
  ],
  "entity": {
    "id": "04_knowledge_base/MI355",
    "label": "MI355"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": null,
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "5,000"
    ],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "5,000"
    ],
    "value_text": "MI355 額定為 5,000 dense FP8 TFLOPs。"
  }
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

RoleSurface LabelCanonical Target
entityMI355MI355
context_0FP8FP8
context_1TFLOPsTFLOPS

⑤ V2 Draft(需要修正時直接編輯)

Inline repair

只編輯以下三個 Draft 區塊。完成後將 review_action 設為 REQUEST_REPAIR,再手動執行 Repair Preview。
執行腳本前,Draft 不會寫入 Claim Store 或 Graph。

V2 Atomic Claim Draft

MI355 額定為 5,000 dense FP8 TFLOPs。

V2 Semantic Frame Draft

{
  "attribute": "COMPUTE_PERFORMANCE",
  "context_nodes": [
    {
      "id": "04_knowledge_base/FP8",
      "label": "FP8"
    },
    {
      "id": "04_knowledge_base/TFLOPS",
      "label": "TFLOPs"
    }
  ],
  "entity": {
    "id": "04_knowledge_base/MI355",
    "label": "MI355"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": null,
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "5,000"
    ],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "5,000"
    ],
    "value_text": "MI355 額定為 5,000 dense FP8 TFLOPs。"
  }
}

V2 Revision Metadata Draft

{
  "epistemic_mode": "ASSERTED",
  "mapping_status": "COMPLETE"
}

⑥ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認:

  • 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
  • Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
  • Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
  • Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
  • 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。