VR2R-0056::SPLIT01
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
Extreme Co-design: 6 Silicon Product Offerings under the Rubin Platform - Chip Floorplans & Specifications - Line hint:
85
Context Before

Source: SemiAnalysis, Nvidia
Evidence
Rubin’s dense FP4 and FP8 FLOPs increase by roughly ~3.5× versus GB200, while FP16 FLOPs rise by a more modest ~1.6x, underscoring NVIDIA’s continued emphasis on FP4/FP8 as the primary scaling vector. On the memory side, HBM capacity remains flat from GB300, while HBM bandwidth scales more aggressively at ~2.8x. Overall, the architecture prioritizes bandwidth and low-precision compute.
Context After

Source: SemiAnalysis, Nvidia
② Atomic Claim
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
COMPLETE
③ Semantic Frame
{
"frame_type": "NARY_RELATION",
"participants": [
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/Vera Rubin",
"label": "Rubin"
},
"role": "subject_system"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/GB200",
"label": "GB200"
},
"role": "comparison_baseline"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/FP4",
"label": "FP4"
},
"role": "metric"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/FP8",
"label": "FP8"
},
"role": "metric"
}
],
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": null,
"numeric_mentions": [
"~3.5x"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"relation_type": "DENSE_LOW_PRECISION_FLOPS_SCALING"
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| subject_system | Rubin | 04_knowledge_base/Vera Rubin |
| comparison_baseline | GB200 | GB200 |
| metric | FP4 | FP4 |
| metric | FP8 | FP8 |
⑤ V2 Draft(需要修正時直接編輯)
Inline repair
只編輯以下三個 Draft 區塊。完成後將
review_action設為REQUEST_REPAIR,再手動執行 Repair Preview。
執行腳本前,Draft 不會寫入 Claim Store 或 Graph。
V2 Atomic Claim Draft
相較 GB200,Rubin 的 dense FP4 與 FP8 FLOPs 約提升 3.5 倍。
V2 Semantic Frame Draft
{
"frame_type": "NARY_RELATION",
"participants": [
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/Vera Rubin",
"label": "Rubin"
},
"role": "subject_system"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/GB200",
"label": "GB200"
},
"role": "comparison_baseline"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/FP4",
"label": "FP4"
},
"role": "metric"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/FP8",
"label": "FP8"
},
"role": "metric"
}
],
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": null,
"numeric_mentions": [
"~3.5x"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"relation_type": "DENSE_LOW_PRECISION_FLOPS_SCALING"
}V2 Revision Metadata Draft
{
"epistemic_mode": "ASSERTED",
"mapping_status": "COMPLETE"
}⑥ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。