clm_7d26b046d3fa4f02bb77f18e4e1b7242_r1

VR2-0167

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: CPX Form Factor
• Line hint: 215

Context Before

Source: Nvidia VR NVL72 BoM and Power Budget Model ↗

Evidence

To recap Rubin-era system planning in our previous CPX article, Nvidia initially contemplated three VR NVL72 configurations:

Context After

VR NVL72 (Regular): Standard Oberon VR NVL72 without CPX

② Atomic Claim

在先前 CPX 文章中，SemiAnalysis 整理 Nvidia 原先考慮的三種 VR NVL72 配置。

• Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
• Mapping Status: COMPLETE

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "frame_type": "NARY_RELATION",
  "participants": [
    {
      "node": {
        "id": "04_knowledge_base/CPX High-Density Interconnect Paradigm",
        "label": "CPX"
      },
      "role": "endpoint_or_system"
    },
    {
      "node": {
        "id": "02_companies/NVDA",
        "label": "Nvidia"
      },
      "role": "connected_entity"
    },
    {
      "node": {
        "id": "04_knowledge_base/VR NVL72",
        "label": "VR NVL72"
      },
      "role": "connected_entity"
    }
  ],
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": null,
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "relation_type": "CONNECTS_TO"
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

Role	Surface Label	Canonical Target
endpoint_or_system	CPX	04_knowledge_base/CPX High-Density Interconnect Paradigm
connected_entity	Nvidia	NVDA
connected_entity	VR NVL72	04_knowledge_base/VR NVL72

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。