VR2-0313
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
PCB vs Flyover Cables - Line hint:
417
Context Before
But now that the NIC is closer to the OSFP cage, the lower speed PCIe Gen6 signal (64Gbit/s per lane uni-directional) travels the longer distance. By making the PCIe Gen6 signal longer, the signal can travel over PCB given that PCIe Gen6 has better signal integrity than the higher speed 200G Ethernet/InfiniBand signal.
PCB vs Flyover Cables
Evidence
Context After
First, we must understand why high-speed signals perform worse on PCB versus flyover cables. As SerDes rates increase, high-speed channels become increasingly constrained by insertion loss introduced by PCB traces, vias, dielectric materials and conductor roughness. Insertion loss is defined as the signal power that is lost as a signal is traveling through an interconnect channel.

② Atomic Claim
即使如此,要讓 PCIe Gen6 signal 從 Strata Module 經約 500mm PCB 距離傳到 Orchid Module 前方,仍具有挑戰。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
PARTIAL
③ Semantic Frame
{
"attribute": "UNSPECIFIED_ATTRIBUTE",
"context_nodes": [
{
"id": "04_knowledge_base/PCB",
"label": "PCB"
}
],
"entity": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/PCIe",
"label": "PCIe Gen6"
},
"frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": null,
"numeric_mentions": [
"500m"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"value": {
"numeric_mentions": [
"500m"
],
"value_text": "即使如此,要讓 PCIe Gen6 signal 從 Strata Module 經約 500mm PCB 距離傳到 Orchid Module 前方,仍具有挑戰。"
}
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。