SA260324R-0330
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
Feynman NVL1152 Networking Topologies - Line hint:
418
Context Before
For rack-to-rack interconnect, we explore two different topologies.
Evidence
The first is a two-layer CLOS network that is similar to the Oberon form factor, but with twice the bandwidth of each GPU and NVLink switch.
Context After
The second is a reconfigurable dragonfly topology using OCS switches to connect the 8 racks. The number of OCS ports required for this topology remains tentative.
② Atomic Claim
第一種是兩層 CLOS network，類似 Oberon form factor，但每顆 GPU 與 NVLink switch bandwidth 都是兩倍。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
COMPLETE
③ Semantic Frame
{
"frame_type": "NARY_RELATION",
"participants": [
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/CLOS network",
"label": "CLOS network"
},
"role": "topology"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/GPU",
"label": "GPU"
},
"role": "device"
},
{
"node": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/NVSwitch",
"label": "NVLink switch"
},
"role": "switch"
}
],
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "similar to Oberon form factor",
"numeric_mentions": [
"2",
"2x"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"relation_type": "TWO_LAYER_CLOS_WITH_DOUBLED_BANDWIDTH"
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| topology | CLOS network | 04_knowledge_base/CLOS network |
| device | GPU | GPU |
| switch | NVLink switch | NVSwitch |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認：
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。