SA260324R-0321_r1

SA260324R-0321

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: Feynman NVL1152 Networking Topologies
• Line hint: 404

Context Before

Within each Feynman Kyber rack, we tentatively assume double the bandwidth per logical GPU and double the NVLink Switch bandwidth to 28.8T and 57.6T respectively.

Evidence

Though Jensen, in the Financial Q+A the day after the GTC Keynote, characterized NVL1152 as “all CPO”, the key technical blog outlining the new rack form factors only strictly referenced CPO for rack to rack interconnect.

Context After

We will discuss the potential topography for both options.

② Atomic Claim

Jensen 在 GTC keynote 隔日的 Financial Q+A 將 NVL1152 描述為「all CPO」，但 rack form-factor technical blog 僅明確提到 CPO 用於 rack-to-rack interconnect。

• Epistemic Mode: ATTRIBUTED
• Mapping Status: PARTIAL

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "frame_type": "NARY_RELATION",
  "participants": [
    {
      "node": {
        "id": "04_knowledge_base/NVL1152",
        "label": "NVL1152"
      },
      "role": "system"
    },
    {
      "node": {
        "id": "04_knowledge_base/CPO",
        "label": "CPO"
      },
      "role": "technology"
    }
  ],
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": "Jensen says all CPO; technical blog strictly references rack-to-rack CPO",
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "relation_type": "NVL1152_CPO_SCOPE_SOURCE_DIFFERENCE"
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

Role	Surface Label	Canonical Target
system	NVL1152	NVL1152
technology	CPO	CPO

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。