SA260324R-0261
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
Rubin Ultra NVL288 - Line hint:
322
Context Before
All current evidence in the supply chain points to NVSwitch 7 being the same bandwidth as NVSwitch 6, but that seems a bit illogical to be frank. Our belief is that NVSwitch 7 is actually 2x the bandwidth and
Evidence
radix of NVSwitch 6, so all-to-all can be done, and architecturally that makes the most sense from a systems perspective.
Context After
② Atomic Claim
……相較 NVSwitch 6 的 radix，如此才能實現 all-to-all；從 system architecture 角度看，這也最合理。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
PARTIAL
③ Semantic Frame
{
"frame_type": "CLAIM_ONLY",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "承接前一條 NVSwitch 7 2x bandwidth；不能把兩條 extraction fragment 合併成新 claim",
"numeric_mentions": [
"6"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"reason": "EXTRACTION_FRAGMENT_CONTINUES_NVSWITCH7_TWO_X_BANDWIDTH_CLAIM",
"statement": "……相較 NVSwitch 6 的 radix，如此才能實現 all-to-all；從 system architecture 角度看，這也最合理。"
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認：
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。