SA260324R-0259
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
Rubin Ultra NVL288 - Line hint:
322
Context Before
All current evidence in the supply chain points to NVSwitch 7 being the same bandwidth as NVSwitch 6, but
Evidence
that seems a bit illogical to be frank.
Context After
Our belief is that NVSwitch 7 is actually 2x the bandwidth and radix of NVSwitch 6, so all-to-all can be done, and architecturally that makes the most sense from a systems perspective.
② Atomic Claim
坦白說，這樣的結果看起來有些不合邏輯。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
PARTIAL
③ Semantic Frame
{
"frame_type": "CLAIM_ONLY",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "that 指涉前一條 NVSwitch 7 與 NVSwitch 6 bandwidth 相同的供應鏈證據",
"numeric_mentions": [],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"reason": "ANALYST_JUDGMENT_DEPENDS_ON_PRIOR_NVSWITCH7_EQUAL_BANDWIDTH_CLAIM",
"statement": "坦白說，這樣的結果看起來有些不合邏輯。"
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認：
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。