SA260324R-0115
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
GPU and LPU Integration: Attention FFN Disaggregation (AFD) - Line hint:
125
Context Before
Comparing the two operations, we see attention is stateful due to dynamic KV cache loading patterns, whereas FFN is stateless since the computation only depends on the token inputs. Thus, we disaggregate the computation of attention and FFN. We map attention computations to GPUs, which handle dynamic workloads well.
Evidence
Context After
With AFD, token routing from GPUs to LPUs can become the bottleneck, especially under strict latency constraints. The token routing flow involves two operations: dispatch and combine. In the dispatch step, we route each token to their top k experts with an All-to-All collective operation. After experts complete their computation, we perform the combine step, where the outputs are sent back to the source location with a reverse All-to-All collective, continuing the next layer’s computation.
② Atomic Claim
FFN 會被分配到 LPU,因為 LPU 架構本質上是 deterministic,並能受益於 static compute workload。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
COMPLETE
③ Semantic Frame
{
"additional_nodes": [],
"frame_type": "RELATION",
"object": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/Groq LPU",
"label": "LPU"
},
"predicate": "MAPS_TO",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "LPU 架構本質上 deterministic,並受益於 static compute workload",
"numeric_mentions": [],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"subject": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/Feed-forward Network",
"label": "FFN"
}
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| subject | FFN | 04_knowledge_base/Feed-forward Network |
| object | LPU | 04_knowledge_base/Groq LPU |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。