VR2R-0720
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
VR NVL72 TCO: BoM and Power Budget Analysis - Line hint:
631
Context Before
VR Max-Q on the other hand, exhibits lower Operating costs relative to MI4XX given the lower chip TDP. For example a VR NVL 72 cluster deployed at a Hyperscaler with Arista networking would have a operating cost of $0.75 per gpu per hour, representing ~20% lower costs vs MI4XX deployed with a Hyperscaler with the same Arista networking. This highlights the advantages of the Max-Q configuration, particularly from an operating cost perspective, as the lower power TDP reduces rack-level power density for a meaningful cost savings over time.
Evidence
The MI4XX currently has a performance per TCO advantage based on marketed dense FLOPS over VR.
Context After
VR has a higher TCO per GPU compared to MI4XX, yet VR marketed PFLOPs are lower vs MI4XX resulting in a TCO per PFLOP disadvantage for the VR vs MI4XX.
② Atomic Claim
以 marketed dense FLOPS 衡量,MI4XX 目前相較 VR 具有 performance-per-TCO 優勢。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
PARTIAL
③ Semantic Frame
{
"attribute": "MARKETED_DENSE_FLOPS_PER_TCO_ADVANTAGE",
"context_nodes": [],
"entity": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/MI400",
"label": "MI4XX"
},
"frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "VR is plain text shorthand",
"numeric_mentions": [],
"temporal_mentions": [
"currently"
]
},
"value": {
"numeric_mentions": [],
"value_text": "MI4XX currently has a performance-per-TCO advantage over VR on marketed dense FLOPS."
}
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| entity | MI4XX | MI400 |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。