VR2R-0719

① SA Source

Context Before

VR Max-Q on the other hand, exhibits lower Operating costs relative to MI4XX given the lower chip TDP. For example a VR NVL 72 cluster deployed at a Hyperscaler with Arista networking would have a operating cost of $0.75 per gpu per hour, representing ~20% lower costs vs MI4XX deployed with a Hyperscaler with the same Arista networking.

Evidence

This highlights the advantages of the Max-Q configuration, particularly from an operating cost perspective, as the lower power TDP reduces rack-level power density for a meaningful cost savings over time.

Context After

The MI4XX currently has a performance per TCO advantage based on marketed dense FLOPS over VR. VR has a higher TCO per GPU compared to MI4XX, yet VR marketed PFLOPs are lower vs MI4XX resulting in a TCO per PFLOP disadvantage for the VR vs MI4XX.

② Atomic Claim

這凸顯 Max-Q configuration 在 operating cost 上的優勢:較低 TDP 會降低 rack-level power density,長期可帶來顯著成本節省。

  • Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
  • Mapping Status: PARTIAL

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "attribute": "MAX_Q_COST_IMPACT",
  "context_nodes": [],
  "entity": {
    "id": "04_knowledge_base/Power Density",
    "label": "power density"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": "Max-Q configuration is plain text",
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "temporal_mentions": [
      "over time"
    ]
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "value_text": "lower TDP reduces rack-level power density and produces meaningful operating-cost savings over time."
  }
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

RoleSurface LabelCanonical Target
entitypower density04_knowledge_base/Power Density

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認:

  • 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
  • Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
  • Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
  • Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
  • 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。