VR2R-0713_r1

VR2R-0713

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: VR NVL72 TCO: BoM and Power Budget Analysis
• Line hint: 615

Context Before

NVIDIA’s 2300W configuration represents the Max-P configuration, while the efficiency optimized Max-Q configuration runs at 1800W. Regardless of which configuration Nvidia claims both can hit the same peak clocks and

Evidence

therefore achieve marketed 50 PFLOPS FP4 performance.

Context After

While the underlying hardware is the same, the TCO implications are due to operating costs from different levels of power consumption.

② Atomic Claim

因此兩種 configuration 都可達到市場宣稱的 50 PFLOPS FP4 performance。

• Epistemic Mode: INFERRED
• Mapping Status: PARTIAL

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "attribute": "MARKETED_PERFORMANCE_ACROSS_MAX_P_MAX_Q",
  "context_nodes": [],
  "entity": {
    "id": "04_knowledge_base/FP4",
    "label": "FP4"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": "inference from same peak-clock claim in VR2R-0712",
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "50 PFLOPS"
    ],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "50 PFLOPS"
    ],
    "value_text": "both configurations are marketed as achieving 50 PFLOPS FP4 performance."
  }
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

Role	Surface Label	Canonical Target
entity	FP4	FP4

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。