VR2R-0691_r1

VR2R-0691

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: VR NVL72 TCO: BoM and Power Budget Analysis
• Line hint: 599

Context Before

Evidence

The VR NVL72 Component BoM and Power Budget Model provides a detailed analysis on the BoM and the Power Budget of the rack system.

Context After

The VR NVL72 is more expensive on a per-GPU capital cost basis, ~45% higher vs GB300s and ~14-15% higher vs the MI4XX given a higher server cost on a per GPU basis. This results in a higher Capital Cost of Ownership (TCO). For example VR NVL 72 Hyperscaler Arista has a capital cost of $3.28to[[04_{k}nowledg{e}_{b}ase/MI400|MI4XX]][[04_{k}nowledg{e}_{b}ase/Hyperscaler|Hyperscaler]]of$2.86 per hour per GPU over a 4 year useful life.

② Atomic Claim

VR NVL72 Component BoM and Power Budget Model 對 rack system 的 BoM 與 power budget 提供詳細分析。

• Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
• Mapping Status: COMPLETE

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "attribute": "BOM_AND_POWER_BUDGET_MODEL_COVERAGE",
  "context_nodes": [],
  "entity": {
    "id": "04_knowledge_base/VR NVL72",
    "label": "VR NVL72"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": null,
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "value_text": "The model provides detailed rack-system BoM and power-budget analysis."
  }
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

Role	Surface Label	Canonical Target
entity	VR NVL72	04_knowledge_base/VR NVL72

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。