VR2R-0298
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
PCB vs Flyover Cables - Line hint:
270
Context Before
Nevertheless, it is still challenging to drive a PCIe Gen6 signal over around 500mm of PCB distance from the Strata Module to the front of the Orchid Module. In addition to having high quality SerDes, proper signal integrity is still achievable by upgrading PCB materials.
Evidence
First, we must understand why high-speed signals perform worse on PCB versus flyover cables.
Context After
As SerDes rates increase, high-speed channels become increasingly constrained by insertion loss introduced by PCB traces, vias, dielectric materials and conductor roughness. Insertion loss is defined as the signal power that is lost as a signal is traveling through an interconnect channel.
② Atomic Claim
首先,需要理解為什麼 high-speed signals 在 PCB 上的表現比 flyover cables 更差。
- Epistemic Mode:
ASSERTED - Mapping Status:
PARTIAL
③ Semantic Frame
{
"attribute": "HIGH_SPEED_SIGNAL_PERFORMANCE_VS_FLYOVER_CABLE",
"context_nodes": [],
"entity": {
"id": "04_knowledge_base/PCB",
"label": "PCB"
},
"frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "flyover cables are plain text in source claim",
"numeric_mentions": [],
"temporal_mentions": []
},
"value": {
"numeric_mentions": [],
"value_text": "high-speed signals perform worse on PCB than on flyover cables."
}
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| entity | PCB | PCB |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。