VR2R-0106

① SA Source

Context Before

Max-P offers the greatest absolute performance though this would come with an efficiency penalty. Running the Max-P setting results in a 20% increase in rack power draw but

Evidence

the performance gain fall well short of this 20% power consumption increase.

Context After

These power profiles are software managed. Users can also choose whatever max power draw they prefer (as long as it is no more than 2,300W per GPU) and this has been the case for previous GPU generations as well. Several hyperscalers and labs have chosen to run their GPUs at lower power to optimize for performance per Watt as well as taking into account power availability constraints.

② Atomic Claim

Performance gain 明顯低於這 20% 的 power consumption 增幅。

  • Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
  • Mapping Status: PARTIAL

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "frame_type": "CLAIM_ONLY",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": "承接 Max-P setting",
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "20%"
    ],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "reason": "RELATIVE_PERFORMANCE_POWER_COMPARISON_HAS_IMPLICIT_SUBJECT",
  "statement": "Performance gain 明顯低於 20% power consumption increase。"
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

RoleSurface LabelCanonical Target
———

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認:

  • 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
  • Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
  • Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
  • Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
  • 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。