VR2R-0103_r1

VR2R-0103

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: Rubin
• Line hint: 85

Context Before

Rubin’s chip level TDP increases up to 2,300W vs 1000-1400W for Blackwell. Supply chain rumors have indicated that there are 2 different “SKUs” with different power and performance profiles: a Max-P variant at 2,300W and a Max-Q variant at 1,800W. However, these are not distinct hardware SKUs but

Evidence

the 2 default power profiles that Nvidia is offering users based on their workload needs. Max-Q is what Nvidia believes offers the best performance per Watt.

Context After

Max-P offers the greatest absolute performance though this would come with an efficiency penalty. Running the Max-P setting results in a 20% increase in rack power draw but the performance gain fall well short of this 20% power consumption increase.

② Atomic Claim

它們是 Nvidia 依 workload needs 提供給 users 的兩個 default power profiles；Nvidia 認為 Max-Q 能提供最佳 performance per Watt。

• Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
• Mapping Status: PARTIAL

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "attribute": "DEFAULT_POWER_PROFILE_POSITIONING",
  "context_nodes": [],
  "entity": {
    "id": "02_companies/NVDA",
    "label": "Nvidia"
  },
  "frame_type": "ATTRIBUTE",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": "Max-Q 未 canonicalized",
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "2"
    ],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "value": {
    "numeric_mentions": [
      "2"
    ],
    "value_text": "提供兩個 default power profiles；Max-Q 被 Nvidia 定位為最佳 performance per Watt。"
  }
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

Role	Surface Label	Canonical Target
entity	Nvidia	NVDA

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。