VR2R-0093
① SA Source
- Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
- Section:
Rubin - Line hint:
79
Context Before
This means the sparser the workload, the closer the performance will be to the 50 PFLOPS marketed peak performance. NVIDIA thus brands the 50 PFLOPS figure as FP4 Inference while the 35 PFLOPS FP4 Training number is for dense workloads.
Evidence
Context After
Whether actual GEMM performance reaches 50 PFLOPS depends on how many zeros are in the tensor.
② Atomic Claim
在維持 accuracy 的前提下,marketing team 可宣稱 Rubin 的 FLOPs 是 GB200 的 5 倍:比較 50 PFLOPS 的 dynamically compressed FP4 與 10 PFLOPS 的 dense FP4。
- Epistemic Mode:
ATTRIBUTED - Mapping Status:
COMPLETE
③ Semantic Frame
{
"comparison_expression": "Rubin marketed FP4 FLOPs is 5x GB200, comparing 50 PFLOPS dynamically compressed FP4 with 10 PFLOPS dense FP4.",
"entities": [
{
"id": "04_knowledge_base/Vera Rubin",
"label": "Rubin"
},
{
"id": "04_knowledge_base/GB200",
"label": "GB200"
},
{
"id": "04_knowledge_base/FP4",
"label": "FP4"
}
],
"frame_type": "COMPARISON",
"metric": "MARKETED_FP4_FLOPS",
"operator": "MULTIPLE_OF",
"qualifiers": {
"condition_text": "accuracy preserved",
"numeric_mentions": [
"5x",
"50 PFLOPS",
"10 PFLOPS"
],
"temporal_mentions": []
}
}④ Canonical Entity Mapping
| Role | Surface Label | Canonical Target |
|---|---|---|
| entity | Rubin | 04_knowledge_base/Vera Rubin |
| entity | GB200 | GB200 |
| entity | FP4 | FP4 |
⑤ Human Review
請在 Properties 逐項確認:
- 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
- Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
- Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
- Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
- 最後選擇
review_action
Review state
Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。