clm_c4b10fa43a9e47228628f1b1f5434115_r1

IX2-0067

① SA Source

• Source: 開啟完整 SA 文章
• Section: Interactivity vs Throughput Tradeoff
• Line hint: 97

Context Before

Source: SemiAnalysis

Evidence

We leave it up to the reader to look at the curve and apply this principle to identify where their use case falls on the throughput-interactivity curve

Context After

The Cost/Perf per TCO vs Interactivity/End-to-End Latency curve mostly follows the Throughput vs Interactivity/End-to-End Latency Curve: More tokens/hour leads to a lower cost per token as fixed $/hour costs are amortized over more tokens produced.

Prefill and Decode Phases

② Atomic Claim

使用者應根據 benchmark curve 判斷自己的 use case 落在 throughput-interactivity curve 的哪個位置。

• Epistemic Mode: ASSERTED
• Mapping Status: CLAIM_ONLY

③ Semantic Frame

{
  "frame_type": "CLAIM_ONLY",
  "qualifiers": {
    "condition_text": null,
    "numeric_mentions": [],
    "temporal_mentions": []
  },
  "reason": "NO_NODE_REQUIRED",
  "statement": "使用者應根據 benchmark curve 判斷自己的 use case 落在 throughput-interactivity curve 的哪個位置。"
}

④ Canonical Entity Mapping

• 此 CLAIM_ONLY revision 沒有 canonical Entity mapping。

⑤ Human Review

請在 Properties 逐項確認：

• 原文 → Atomic Claim 是否忠實
• Atomic Claim → Semantic Frame 是否忠實
• Canonical Entity mapping 是否正確
• Epistemic mode 是否保留原文語氣
• 最後選擇 review_action

Review state

Markdown 內文不是正式 approval。只有 Apply bridge 寫入的 Decision Ledger event 才是正式決策。