Atomic Claim Phase B — proposal review
Phase A / B completion — 2026-09-10
Historical Phase B checkpoint. The subsequent user-authorized Phase C–E audit and formal Apply are recorded in the completion report. The proposal details below remain unchanged for traceability.
Proposal-only completion at this checkpoint: all 494 non-PASS audit cards had a proposed disposition. This checkpoint alone was not Phase C coverage certification or permission to Apply.
- Phase A: 57 resegmentation bundles READY (138 successors); all 204 split source cards READY (598 successors across batches 01–25).
- Phase B: 181 / 181 READY, 0 BLOCKED: 95 META exclusions; 69 epistemic cards (68 repaired, one covered by RSG-012); 17 claim repairs (11 repaired, six excluded with source context retained).
- Phase B totals: 101 exclusions, 79 repaired source cards producing 84 successor revisions, one resegmentation cross-reference with no duplicate action. Five compound epistemic repairs produce two successors each.
- Combined successor proposals: 820. A cross-proposal identity check found no duplicate successor revision keys or duplicate source-action targets.
- Production Claim Store, Decision Ledger, article contents and Neo4j remain unchanged. Phase C keyword/source coverage, integrated Apply planning and promotion remain pending.
- Review:
80_review/10_atomic_claims/phase_b_remediation.md; machine preview:90_system/audit/atomic_claim_phase_b/2026-09-10_preview.json.
Card dispositions
Exact evidence, revision fingerprints, proposed revisions and decision rationale are preserved in 90_system/knowledge_graph/state/atomic_claim_audit_v2/phase_b_plan_v1.json. Exclusion retains the original source; it is not deletion. READY validates proposal structure and source bindings, not full source coverage.
| Card | Audit category | Proposed outcome | Successors | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA260324R-0001 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Qualitative event-recap framing (packed full of ground breaking announcements) rather than durable knowledge. |
| SA260324R-0004 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | was also a key topic is article/keynote framing, not durable substantive knowledge. |
| SA260324R-0006 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | This is our GTC 2026 recap is article metadata/navigation. |
| SA260324R-0007 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about addressing unanswered questions. |
| SA260324R-0008 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan/navigation statement. |
| SA260324R-0009 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about introducing LP30 / explaining AFD. |
| SA260324R-0010 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement describing what later sections will cover. |
| SA260324R-0011 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Vague section transition (big updates / hidden details) without a durable specific proposition. |
| SA260324R-0012 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Section-transition/navigation statement (First up is the Groq LPU). |
| SA260324R-0013 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Corrected subject/relation or generation materially changes the underspecified source identity. |
| SA260324R-0021 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-navigation statement about reviewing the LPU architecture. |
| SA260324R-0022 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Cross-reference to another article, not domain knowledge. |
| SA260324R-0035 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Corrected subject/relation or generation materially changes the underspecified source identity. |
| SA260324R-0056 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0057 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference saying SemiAnalysis previously discussed SRAM in the memory hierarchy. |
| SA260324R-0058 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0067 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0068 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | paywall teaser about revealing the SerDes IP vendor and the answer being surprising. |
| SA260324R-0072 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0091 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference saying the details were already in the Accelerator model. |
| SA260324R-0092 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | section-transition language (now that we understand what LPUs are good for...). |
| SA260324R-0106 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | self-referential research-process statement about working with hardware/memory companies for six months; not the substantive technical finding itself. |
| SA260324R-0128 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | Exclude the vague difference shell; the subsequent FFN statelessness, dynamic KV loading and memory-footprint cards carry the actual distinctions. |
| SA260324R-0134 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | section-transition / rhetorical setup (let's look at LPX... interesting details). |
| SA260324R-0138 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-plan statement saying the production version will be described next. |
| SA260324R-0139 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference saying the content was already detailed in the Accelerator model. |
| SA260324R-0147 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | Exclude the rhetorical important-role shell; the following FPGA naming, NIC conversion and control-flow cards carry concrete functions. |
| SA260324R-0158 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-plan statement (we will share more when describing the network). |
| SA260324R-0159 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| SA260324R-0185 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0186 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0187 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0188 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0200 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| SA260324R-0209 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | roadmap list-introduction shell (our best estimate is as follows) rather than an actual roadmap item. |
| SA260324R-0210 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Corrected subject/relation or generation materially changes the underspecified source identity. |
| SA260324R-0211 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Corrected subject/relation or generation materially changes the underspecified source identity. |
| SA260324R-0215 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0220 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | vague transition noting that a prototype architecture has changed, without the concrete change itself. |
| SA260324R-0224 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | scope note saying the following details are based on Rubin Kyber prototypes. |
| SA260324R-0225 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0228 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | figure-caption content (Kyber midplane PCB, GPU side) rather than a research proposition; current §3§ placeholder also demonstrates poor normalization. |
| SA260324R-0229 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | pure source-caption attribution (Nvidia, SemiAnalysis). |
| SA260324R-0235 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0239 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0246 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0248 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0249 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0250 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0251 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0253 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0255 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0257 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0259 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | rhetorical analyst reaction (this seems illogical) without the substantive alternative hypothesis; keep the actual evidence and hypothesis in neighboring Claims instead. |
| SA260324R-0267 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference saying SemiAnalysis previously showed a GB200 NVL576 concept; substantive architecture facts should live in their own Claims rather than the “we showed this before” wrapper. |
| SA260324R-0269 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 2 | Epistemic review also exposes independent propositions; route through atomic decomposition, preserving each source scope without donating the composite lineage. |
| SA260324R-0270 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | institutional-research sales pitch / contact information. |
| SA260324R-0271 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | qualitative hype (Feynman will be exciting) rather than a durable technical proposition; the concrete technologies follow separately. |
| SA260324R-0275 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | paywall navigation saying possible configurations will be shown later. |
| SA260324R-0289 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference saying CMX/ICMS was extensively discussed in prior research. |
| SA260324R-0306 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | pure figure/source caption attribution. |
| SA260324R-0311 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | pure figure/source caption attribution. |
| SA260324R-0313 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0316 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | paywall/article-plan statement about sharing supply-chain impacts. |
| SA260324R-0317 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | paywall/article-plan statement about covering LPX/Kyber beneficiaries. |
| SA260324R-0318 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | teaser that an unannounced rack concept will be revealed. |
| SA260324R-0322 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-navigation statement saying two topology options will be discussed later. |
| SA260324R-0323 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0327 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0329 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction shell saying two rack-to-rack topologies are explored; the actual topology Claims follow. |
| SA260324R-0330 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0331 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0333 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | section-transition statement introducing supply-chain implications. |
| SA260324R-0334 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0338 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0339 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0345 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0350 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0352 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0357 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | narrative color saying an arrangement had been in the works for a long time and is now settled; the licensing event itself is already captured. |
| SA260324R-0358 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0360 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | vague qualitative lead-in that Nvidia is “in the driver’s seat” on IP; the proprietary Voronoi specification is the concrete durable fact. |
| SA260324R-0363 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0364 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0368 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| SA260324R-0369 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | institutional-subscriber sales pitch. |
| SA260324R-0376 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | figure-caption observation duplicating the substantive MPO-vs-OSFP architecture already captured by neighboring Claims. |
| SA260324R-0377 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | pure source-caption attribution. |
| SA260324R-0382 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Corrected subject/relation or generation materially changes the underspecified source identity. |
| VR2R-0015 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about what later sections will discuss. |
| VR2R-0016 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article navigation / section-plan fragment. |
| VR2R-0017 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about later design/component discussion. |
| VR2R-0018 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about later network coverage. |
| VR2R-0019 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about later logistics/supplier discussion. |
| VR2R-0020 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about the closing TCO/BoM/Power Budget discussion; estimate here describes planned content, not a durable extracted fact. |
| VR2R-0021 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Paywall/content-navigation statement. |
| VR2R-0022 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Article-plan statement about later HBM-ramp coverage. |
| VR2R-0023 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | SemiAnalysis product/tool launch metadata, not durable domain knowledge for the Research Vault graph. |
| VR2R-0024 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Description of the SemiAnalysis companion model rather than the underlying VR NVL72 domain facts. |
| VR2R-0025 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Rhetorical connective fragment (This is important because...) and not an independent durable proposition. |
| VR2R-0026 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0061 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| VR2R-0066 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Explicit article-navigation statement about explaining the feature later. |
| VR2R-0075 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | Cross-promotion / subscription-research navigation rather than the underlying HBM supplier fact. |
| VR2R-0088 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0092 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 2 | Epistemic review also exposes independent propositions; route through atomic decomposition, preserving each source scope without donating the composite lineage. |
| VR2R-0098 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0108 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| VR2R-0136 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | The vague design-difference shell has no independent detail; concrete Grace/CX-9 architecture remains in VR2R-0137 and adjacent cards. |
| VR2R-0148 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0150 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-reference to what SemiAnalysis discussed in an earlier GB200 article. |
| VR2R-0159 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction header (system consists of the following components) without a durable component relation by itself. |
| VR2R-0170 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | The deployment-calculus shell adds no independent proposition; the explicit disaggregation consequences remain in the following source cards and their resegmentation plans. |
| VR2R-0178 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| VR2R-0180 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0184 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | The generic compute-tray-change shell adds no independent fact; cable elimination, assembly-time attribution and modular connections are represented in subsequent cards. |
| VR2R-0188 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-navigation wording (to understand the compute tray, first understand six modules). |
| VR2R-0216 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | COVERED_BY_RESEGMENTATION | 0 | RSG-012 already rejects this fragment and reuses EXPECTED VR2-0218; do not allocate or retire it twice. |
| VR2R-0238 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0246 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction header (management modules include the following). |
| VR2R-0275 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article/section plan describing what later sections will discuss. |
| VR2R-0276 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article/section plan describing what later sections will discuss. |
| VR2R-0278 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction statement (this design has two reasons) without durable knowledge by itself. |
| VR2R-0287 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0298 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | explanatory navigation (first, we must understand why...). |
| VR2R-0313 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | highway-bump analogy for PCB discontinuities; explanatory rhetoric rather than durable technical fact. |
| VR2R-0334 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-navigation statement about discussing materials upgrades below. |
| VR2R-0355 | CLAIM_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Restore source subject/qualifier without identity change. |
| VR2R-0365 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | qualitative rhetorical shell (takes liquid cooling to the next level); concrete cooling facts follow separately. |
| VR2R-0377 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | vague lead-in (cold plate has several upgrades) rather than a specific durable proposition. |
| VR2R-0423 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | editorial framing about the most notable point in the cooling discussion. |
| VR2R-0424 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | surprise/reaction framing for the cooling-supplier ecosystem; the substantive 45°C capability is captured separately. |
| VR2R-0425 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | broad author framing (continuation of existing trends) without a sufficiently specific reusable proposition. |
| VR2R-0438 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 2 | Epistemic review also exposes independent propositions; route through atomic decomposition, preserving each source scope without donating the composite lineage. |
| VR2R-0441 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | rhetorical question about how Nvidia cools the heat monster. |
| VR2R-0442 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-transition statement (before answering, another consideration). |
| VR2R-0449 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | vague framing (cooling follows straightforward physics); the actual flow/temperature/pressure propositions follow separately. |
| VR2R-0462 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0468 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 2 | Epistemic review also exposes independent propositions; route through atomic decomposition, preserving each source scope without donating the composite lineage. |
| VR2R-0470 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0485 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-history / cross-reference framing about what the 2024 GB200 article discussed. |
| VR2R-0488 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | section plan describing what will be discussed next. |
| VR2R-0503 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | editorial setup saying two possible scenarios will be presented next. |
| VR2R-0514 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | qualitative lead-in (evolutionary, not revolutionary) without a sufficiently concrete durable technical relation. |
| VR2R-0516 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | navigation to a separate future article. |
| VR2R-0518 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0576 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0577 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction header (three flavors) without the actual deployment relations. |
| VR2R-0582 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0593 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0594 | CLAIM_REPAIR | EXCLUDE | 0 | Exclude the formula-introduction shell, which contains no formula. The source equation and the explicit calculation cards VR2R-0597 / VR2R-0601 remain preserved; the general formula coverage check is reserved for Phase C. |
| VR2R-0595 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | illustrative setup announcing two hypothetical scenarios rather than one of the scenario results. |
| VR2R-0596 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0597 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0599 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0600 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 2 | Epistemic review also exposes independent propositions; route through atomic decomposition, preserving each source scope without donating the composite lineage. |
| VR2R-0601 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0614 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0617 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | a rhetorical question split across two cards; neither is durable knowledge. |
| VR2R-0618 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | a rhetorical question split across two cards; neither is durable knowledge. |
| VR2R-0626 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | comparison setup describing the basis of the following calculation. |
| VR2R-0652 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0656 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | list-introduction shell stating that there are two hyperscaler backend deployment forms; the durable forms are already carried by the following rows. |
| VR2R-0659 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0665 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0682 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | vague event/lead-in saying Jensen mentioned benefits of the cableless design; the concrete assembly-time result is the substantive fact. |
| VR2R-0683 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0689 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0691 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | self-reference describing what the Component BoM / Power Budget Model analyzes. |
| VR2R-0695 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | model-methodology self-reference about using a four-year useful life for capital-cost/hour calculation. |
| VR2R-0697 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | source-methodology preference for Project IRR rather than a domain fact about the underlying systems. |
| VR2R-0699 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0700 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | rhetorical “Central Bank of AI” restatement; the concrete customer-memory-price exposure proposition is already represented separately. |
| VR2R-0709 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0715 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | article-navigation statement about what detailed numbers will be shown next. |
| VR2R-0725 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | comparison-methodology caveat describing the source’s chosen marketed-dense-PFLOP basis rather than a standalone system fact. |
| VR2R-0728 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0730 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0744 | EPISTEMIC_REPAIR | REPAIR_REVISION | 1 | Same proposition identity; correct source certainty/attribution and make inherited context explicit. |
| VR2R-0746 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-promotion / paywalled Accelerator Model teaser. |
| VR2R-0749 | META_EXCLUDE | EXCLUDE | 0 | cross-promotion stating that another supply-chain detail is available in the Accelerator Model note. |